| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Date: | 2003-02-02 19:13:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20030202191340.GA10137@ping.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 12:49:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Gavin Sherry wrote:
> >> I don't think we should listen on IPv6 just because it is supported. It
> >> should be a configuration variable:
> >>
> >> tcpip_socket = true
> >> ipv6 = true
>
> > We had a huge discussion on this. I think you were away for it. You
> > can control what you listen on by modifying pg_hba.conf.
>
> Can you actually control whether the postmaster is listening by
> modifying pg_hba.conf? I don't think so.
Why isn't virtual_host used for deciding to what addresses it
should listen?
It currently only seems to support 1 address, and I don't really
know why. Is there a reason you can't make this a list of
hostnames/ip addresses? It really is where it belongs.
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-02 19:23:35 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-02 18:51:36 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2003-02-02 19:18:17 | Re: PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-02 18:51:36 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |