Re: Request for qualified column names

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Reggie Burnett <rykr(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, "'Dave Cramer'" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names
Date: 2003-01-28 22:00:44
Message-ID: 200301282200.h0SM0iK01186@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow. It seems kind
of odd so I don't want to make too complex an implementation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > My idea on this after chat with Dave was to add a GUC option that puts
> > the schema.table.column name as the default column label, rather than
> > just the column name.
>
> Can someone explain why this is needed at all? There is a reason why the
> SQL standard does not provide for this information: it's not well defined.
> Are you trying to make up a poor substitute for updatable views?
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-28 22:04:22 Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-28 22:00:06 Re: docbook and postgresql