From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Client failure allows backed to continue |
Date: | 2003-01-28 03:34:08 |
Message-ID: | 200301280334.h0S3Y8329633@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > As part of the training class I did, some people tested what happens
> > when the client allocates tons of memory to store a result and aborts.
>
> > What we found was that though elog was properly called:
>
> > elog(COMMERROR, "pq_recvbuf: recv() failed: %m");
>
> > (I think that was the message.) the backend did not exit and kept
> > eating CPU. I think the problem is that the elog code only exits on
> > ERROR, not COMMERROR. Is there some way to fix this?
>
> There's been talk of setting the QueryCancel flag after detecting a
> client communication failure ... but no one has ever done the legwork
> to see if that works nicely, or what downsides it might have.
Why is COMMERROR not doing the longjump like ERROR?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-28 03:43:25 | Re: Client failure allows backed to continue |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-28 03:31:45 | Re: Client failure allows backed to continue |