From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IPv6 patch |
Date: | 2003-01-28 02:07:34 |
Message-ID: | 200301280207.h0S27Zf18107@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
That is _exactly_ how it has to be done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I had someone on the IPv6 IRC channel interested, but haven't seen any
> > patch yet. It isn't that hard to do.
>
> If we cleanly split the Postgres-specific code from the stuff that's
> been imported from BIND, shouldn't it be easy to import new versions,
> and thus get IPv6 support for free?
>
> Or at least, that's what I vaguely recall Paul Vixie saying on
> pgsql-patches a while ago:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=200202221828.g1MISX102055%40candle.pha.pa.us&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dpaul%2Bvixie%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.patches%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D200202221828.g1MISX102055%2540candle.pha.pa.us%26rnum%3D2
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-28 03:08:49 | Re: IPv6 patch |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-01-28 02:06:11 | Re: IPv6 patch |