| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 patch |
| Date: | 2003-01-27 21:32:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200301272132.h0RLWEQ08862@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was not made is
> > only printed if the binary supports IPv6. The message seems to be a
> > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.
>
> I'm not sure. Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
> who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the configurability nor
> any failure.
That is the compromise. Neither gets what they want, but the final
solution is closer to each. This is probably the best we can do.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-27 21:36:56 | Caught up |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-27 21:29:52 | Re: [BUGS] New hashed IN code ignores distinctiveness of subquery |