| From: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
| Date: | 2003-01-26 16:17:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20030126161742.GA20331@wallace.ece.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 09:55:25PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > We'll see how it pans out, I guess.
> >
> > Red Hat certainly thought it was worth spending some time on; reference their
> > back porting of the fixes to versions as old as 6.5.3.
>
> If we can get them all, it is a big win. If we can't, I don't think it
> is a win.
In the context of backporting, this is true, but in general, if you
don't worry about putting locks on any of the doors, because there are
other ones open, you _never_ get them all.
Ross
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-26 19:09:49 | Re: New hashed IN code ignores distinctiveness of subquery |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-01-26 16:03:00 | Re: [SQL] Function for adding Money type |