From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: default to WITHOUT OIDS? Possible related problem |
Date: | 2003-01-26 02:16:51 |
Message-ID: | 200301260216.h0Q2GpA24295@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Daniel Kalchev <daniel(at)digsys(dot)bg> writes:
> >
> >>If ever this happens, same should be considered for tables created via the
> >>SELECT INTO statement. These are in many cases 'temporary' in nature and do
> >>not need OIDs (while making much use of the OIDs counter).
> >
> >
> > SELECT INTO does create tables without OIDs, as of 7.3. We've already
> > had complaints about that ;-)
>
> I very recently updated one of my servers to 7.3.1. Various MS tools have
> started to give me guff when trying to access views in databases on that
> server through ODBC. Especially, MS Query (yes, I have some Excel users
> needing that) started complaining that "this table has no OID", which
> really means that the ODBC driver complaints that ...
>
> Is that a side effect of the above problem ?
Yes. We think we may have a fix in 7.3.2.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-01-26 02:32:21 | Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-26 02:15:53 | Re: What goes into the security doc? |