| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE |
| Date: | 2003-01-23 11:53:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200301230653.25557.darcy@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 23 January 2003 06:34, Curt Sampson wrote:
> The ideal sitaution for me would be to have WITHOUT OIDS be the default
> for all table creations, and but of course allow WITH OIDS for backward
Why not make it a configuration option? I can actually think of a third
behaviour that would make sense for me. Have it so that OIDs are created by
default if there is no primary key defined and not if there is.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder | 2003-01-23 13:18:51 | BAD sig (was: Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...) |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-01-23 11:34:59 | Re: Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE |