Re: change in behaviour? Is this a regression in function?

From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin(dot)atkinson(at)ury(dot)york(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: change in behaviour? Is this a regression in function?
Date: 2003-01-18 19:22:19
Message-ID: 20030118185951.X45798-100000@ury.york.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So I guess the question at this point is do we want to flip-flop the
> >> behavior yet again, or leave well enough alone?
>
> > I don't have a problem with making no oids the default. I just think
> > CREATE TABLE and CREATE TABLE AS should behave similarly in terms of
> > oids.
>
> Well, that is a good point. If we are going to change it back, I'd vote
> for back-patching the change into 7.3.2 so as to minimize the exposure
> of the current behavior.
>
> Any other opinions out there?

I'm in favour of this, as it came as quite a suprise when my application
stopped working and I spent quite a bit of time debugging it (I
originally thought it was a configuration option difference). I like the
idea of having WITH and WITHOUT OIDS options to CREATE TABLE AS as well -
there have been quite a few times when I have not needed them. But, like
CREATE TABLE, i think oids should be created by default.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sziklai Gabor 2003-01-18 22:36:23 help on query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-18 17:21:04 Re: change in behaviour? Is this a regression in function?