From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | kanchana <pkkanchana(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fw: configure error with krb5 |
Date: | 2003-01-18 15:30:46 |
Message-ID: | 200301181530.h0IFUkP12340@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
kanchana wrote:
> Hello Bruce Momjian,
>
> Thanks a lot for all. I tried by adding -lcurses on link line of psql.
> Looks like it works fine.
>
> Next i moved to compile with krb5, it gives error.
> as follows..........
> #./configure --prefix=/opt/postgresql --enable-integer-datetimes --with-open
> ssl=/usr/local/ssl --with-krb5=/usr/local/krb5
>
> ----------no problem here.
>
> #gmake gives ERROR
> :
> :
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld -b +b /opt/postgresql/lib fe-auth.o fe-connect.o fe-exec.o
> fe-misc.o fe-print.o fe-lobj.o pqexpbuffer.o dllist.o md5.o pqsignal.o
> fe-secure.o wchar.o
> encnames.o -L/usr/local/krb5/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5
> -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lnsl -o libpq.sl
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: (Warning) At least one PA 2.0 object file (fe-auth.o) was
> detected. The linked output may not run on a PA 1.x system.
> /usr/ccs/bin/ld: DP relative code in file
> /usr/local/krb5/lib/libkrb5.a(init_ctx.o) - shared library must be position
> independent. Use +z or +Z to recompile.
Right here, it looks like the k5crypto library wasn't created properly.
I think the problem is that it is trying to create a shared libpq, but
kerberos is a non-shared *.a library, or has non-shared object files in
it. Just a guess, of course.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jco | 2003-01-18 15:39:52 | Re: libpq C library Client Interface - select() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-18 15:26:09 | Re: change in behaviour? Is this a regression in function? |