Re: Sun vs. Mac

From: CaptainX0r <captainx0r(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun vs. Mac
Date: 2003-01-14 18:41:06
Message-ID: 20030114184106.93556.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

> Just for giggles, do you have a spare drive or something you
> can try
> loading debian or some other Sparc compatible linux distro and
> get some
> numbers? My experience has been that on the same basic

This was on the todo list, "just to see", but I'm not sure how
much time we want to spend trying a myriad of options when
concentrating on one should (maybe?) do the trick.

> hardware, Linux runs postgresql about twice as fast as
> Solaris, and no amount of tweaking seemed to ever get
> postgresql up to the same performance on Solaris. It's
> so bad a Sparc 20 with 256 Meg ram and a 50 MHz 32 bit CPU
> running linux was outrunning our Sun Ultra 1 with 512 Meg ram

> and a 150 MHz 64 bit CPU by about 50%. That was with the
> 2.0.x kernel for linux and

This is not encouraging..... We may be revisiting the linux
option.

Thanks much for the input,

-X

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CaptainX0r 2003-01-14 19:01:49 Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform?
Previous Message eric soroos 2003-01-14 18:39:05 Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform?