| From: | CaptainX0r <captainx0r(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sun vs. Mac |
| Date: | 2003-01-14 18:41:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20030114184106.93556.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
> Just for giggles, do you have a spare drive or something you
> can try
> loading debian or some other Sparc compatible linux distro and
> get some
> numbers? My experience has been that on the same basic
This was on the todo list, "just to see", but I'm not sure how
much time we want to spend trying a myriad of options when
concentrating on one should (maybe?) do the trick.
> hardware, Linux runs postgresql about twice as fast as
> Solaris, and no amount of tweaking seemed to ever get
> postgresql up to the same performance on Solaris. It's
> so bad a Sparc 20 with 256 Meg ram and a 50 MHz 32 bit CPU
> running linux was outrunning our Sun Ultra 1 with 512 Meg ram
> and a 150 MHz 64 bit CPU by about 50%. That was with the
> 2.0.x kernel for linux and
This is not encouraging..... We may be revisiting the linux
option.
Thanks much for the input,
-X
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CaptainX0r | 2003-01-14 19:01:49 | Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform? |
| Previous Message | eric soroos | 2003-01-14 18:39:05 | Re: Sun vs. Mac - best Postgres platform? |