| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| Date: | 2003-01-12 23:57:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200301122357.h0CNvCJ24464@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?.
>
> Yes. Should cursors be positioned on the last row
> or EOF by MOVE LAST ? Anyway I see no necessity to use
> the standard keyword LAST currently.
>
> > I think MOVE LAST works well.
OK, so we will switch it to MOVE END. That seems OK.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-13 00:44:50 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-01-12 23:38:02 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-13 00:44:50 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-01-12 23:38:02 | Re: MOVE LAST: why? |