Re: IPv6 patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch
Date: 2003-01-09 21:53:54
Message-ID: 200301092153.h09Lrs214394@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > OK, Peter, to keep you and everyone happy, what changes are your
> > proposing to the existing code, if any. The only current behavior is
> > printing an IPv6 failure for IPv6-enabled backend in the server logs.
>
> Just bind to all addresses you can find, IPv4 or IPv6. And leave
> pg_hba.conf alone.

OK, you mentioned you want to put IPv6 addresses in pg_hba.conf even if
the OS doesn't support it. How do others feel about that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-09 21:55:02 Re: Dollar in identifiers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-09 21:53:25 Re: EXPLAIN EXECUTE