Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c

Files removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> Tom> Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> writes:
> >> Why is it that bit.h is in src/include/utils and bit.c is in
> >> src/backend/lib ?
>
> Tom> Possibly a more interesting question is why haven't we
> Tom> ditched them both ... AFAICT none of the bit.c routines are
> Tom> used anymore.
>
> True. I just searched and found the only uses of the bitmask functions
> (now greatly expanded) in our code :-)
>
> --
> Pip-pip
> Sailesh
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073