Re: Patch 2 typos in libpq docs

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ljb <lbayuk(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch 2 typos in libpq docs
Date: 2003-01-07 22:52:55
Message-ID: 200301072252.h07Mqt924998@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


I have backpatched the fix into 7.3.X.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ljb wrote:
> Both these fixes are to the new "Files" section in the libpq chapter of the
> 7.3.1 Programmer's Guide. The first fix gets rid of a bogus ">" which
> appears in the HTML output at the start of the first paragraph. I have no
> idea why DocBook turns the "/>" into an extra >. The second fix is an
> obvious typo.
>
>
> --- sgml/libpq.sgml.bak 2002-11-08 00:10:00.000000000 -0500
> +++ sgml/libpq.sgml 2002-12-26 20:38:01.000000000 -0500
> @@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@
> <primary>files</primary>
> </indexterm>
> <para>
> -<anchor id="pgpassfile"/>
> +<anchor id="pgpassfile">
> <indexterm>
> <primary>password</primary>
> <secondary>.pgpass</secondary>
> @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@
> <para>
> The permissions on <filename>.pgpass</filename> must disallow any
> access to world or group; achieve this by the command
> -<command>chmod 0600 .pgaccess</command>.
> +<command>chmod 0600 .pgpass</command>.
> If the permissions are less strict than this, the file will be ignored.
> </para>
> </sect1>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Barwick 2003-01-12 11:24:08 FAQs and installed HTML documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-05 03:51:37 Re: status of 7.3 docs?