Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: "Charles H(dot) Woloszynski" <chw(at)clearmetrix(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...
Date: 2003-01-02 20:30:57
Message-ID: 20030102203057.GC68301@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:07:48PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > else to do the same. In the big picture, marketing statements like
> > this survey mean alot more than most technical folks want to
> > acknowledge.

The figures would be a lot more interesting anyway if people bothered
to correlate results with user bases. A vote from someone who knows
several of the contending products means a lot more to me than one
from someone who hasn't seen aything else.

> Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see
> http://polls.unixathome.org/

Does it support hanging chads?

Jeroen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-01-02 20:35:34 Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...
Previous Message Dan Langille 2003-01-02 20:07:48 Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-01-02 20:35:34 Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...
Previous Message Peter Darley 2003-01-02 20:15:27 Re: Aggregate working on ordered data

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-01-02 20:35:34 Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-02 20:20:35 Re: pg_dump.options.diff