From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Charles H(dot) Woloszynski" <chw(at)clearmetrix(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... |
Date: | 2003-01-02 20:30:57 |
Message-ID: | 20030102203057.GC68301@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:07:48PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > else to do the same. In the big picture, marketing statements like
> > this survey mean alot more than most technical folks want to
> > acknowledge.
The figures would be a lot more interesting anyway if people bothered
to correlate results with user bases. A vote from someone who knows
several of the contending products means a lot more to me than one
from someone who hasn't seen aything else.
> Coincidentally, I've just started up a voting script project... see
> http://polls.unixathome.org/
Does it support hanging chads?
Jeroen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-02 20:35:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... |
Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-02 20:07:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-02 20:35:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... |
Previous Message | Peter Darley | 2003-01-02 20:15:27 | Re: Aggregate working on ordered data |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-02 20:35:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-02 20:20:35 | Re: pg_dump.options.diff |