Re: Documentation in book length

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Date: 2003-01-02 23:41:23
Message-ID: 200301021841.23651.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> more logical order. They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs. Is this a good
> time to think about looking over what they've done?

http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/

See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'.

They are quite good.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-01-03 01:00:04 Re: Documentation in book length
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-02 23:36:03 Re: Documentation in book length