Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable
Date: 2003-01-02 19:19:23
Message-ID: 20030102111557.Y92622-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2 Jan 2003, Rod Taylor wrote:

> I think I initially forgot those options, and Stephans patch seems to be
> everything required -- though the psql display is a little more
> cluttered.

IIRC, theoretically only initially immediate deferrable actually
needs to specify both clauses (initially deferred guarantees deferrable
and not deferrable doesn't need an initially at all). It seemed like that
was getting too cute though for a quick patch.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-02 19:37:56 Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable
Previous Message snpe 2003-01-02 19:07:56 Re: [HACKERS] Cast your vote ...