| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update on replication |
| Date: | 2002-12-18 00:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20021217202942.G63985-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I meant it would cause other solutions to be less desirable, meaning. as
> you said, "affect the ability to investigate other solutions?" With a
> working solution, others may be less likely to investigate because
> Postgres-R will be our official solution. (I believe that was your
> major negative point.) However, with the hooks already there, people
> may be _more_ likely to investigate solutions, so there is really no way
> to know.
Okay, but if we are just adding hooks to allow Postgres-R to tie in, can't
those hooks be done in such a way as to be loadable, not compiled in?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-12-18 01:12:38 | Re: Update on replication |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-18 00:27:37 | Re: Update on replication |