From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
Date: | 2002-12-16 16:15:27 |
Message-ID: | 200212161615.gBGGFSe03188@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > meaning if ecpg references PGnotify, should it have a new major number
> > too,
>
> No, because PGnotify is *not part of ecpg's API*.
>
> The ecpg library, when compiled, will show a dependency on the new major
> number for libpq. That does not mean that applications linked to ecpg
> need to be recompiled. They don't (unless they depend directly on libpq
> too).
OK, got it. That's the think I needed to understand.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-16 16:22:46 | pgsql-server/src backend/nodes/nodes.c backend ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-16 16:12:31 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |