Re: RedHat attitude

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RedHat attitude
Date: 2002-12-16 09:14:53
Message-ID: 200212161014.53758.jm.poure@freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Le Dimanche 15 Décembre 2002 23:14, Gavin Sherry a écrit :
> Red Hat employ. Tom and some other programmers who work on Postgres. They
> don't appear to drag Tom around the world like a show pony. In fact, Red
> Hat do not do that to any of the programmers they employ. They have to
> make money from that and if that means selling software and services, so
> be it. Anything Red Hat does in marketing the Red Hat Database will help
> PostgreSQL -- it increases the market for open source databases and it
> increases the people's exposure to PostgreSQL.

Dear Gavin,

I agree with you as regards employment and RedHat marketing efforts. My only
concerns are that :
1) Changing PostgreSQL name to RedHat database is unfair and useless.
2) RedHat may close RedHat database sources in a near future.

Kpackage dissapeared from RedHat 8.0. People will soon have to pay to download
RPM packages.

As regards the PostgreSQL license, do you think it is ***technicaly***
possible to close RedHat database sources? I don't know the PostgreSQL
license enough to answer the question. Maybe you know the answer, can it be
done by law?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2002-12-16 09:44:52 Re: RedHat attitude
Previous Message Kevin Brown 2002-12-16 07:15:49 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group