Re: Big 7.4 items

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com, patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, jrnield(at)usol(dot)com
Subject: Re: Big 7.4 items
Date: 2002-12-13 19:09:16
Message-ID: 200212131909.gBDJ9GM23960@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 13:20, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Let me address the Spread issue and two-phase commit. (Spread is an
> > open source piece of software used by Postgres-R.)
>
> Note that while Spread is open source in the sense that "the source is
> available", it's license is significantly more restrictive than
> PostgreSQL's:
>
> http://www.spread.org/license/
>

Interesting. It looks like a modified version of the old BSD license
where you are required to mention you are using Spread. I believe we
can get that reduced. (I think Darren already addressed this with
them.) We certainly are not going to accept software that requires all
PostgreSQL user sites to mention Spread.

The whole "mention" aspect of the old BSD license was pretty ambiguous,
and I assume this is similar.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-13 19:13:21 Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-12-13 19:01:30 Re: Big 7.4 items