From: | Chris Gamache <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | A Costly function + LIMIT |
Date: | 2002-12-13 18:14:35 |
Message-ID: | 20021213181435.31771.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
PostgreSQL 7.2.3
I have a function that is quite costly to run on 1000's of records... Let's
call it "widget".
I have a query
(SELECT name, address, city, state, zip, widget(name, address, city, state,
zip)
FROM eastern_usa
ORDER BY state, city, zip, name
LIMIT 5000)
UNION ALL
(SELECT name, address, city, state, zip, widget(name, address, city, state,
zip)
FROM western_usa
ORDER BY state, city, zip, name
LIMIT 5000)
ORDER BY 4, 3, 5, 1 LIMIT 100 OFFSET 0;
It runs "widget" on 10000 records. The damage would be negligible if it could
run on the 100...
Any ideas?
CG
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-13 18:20:49 | Re: A Costly function + LIMIT |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-13 18:12:05 | Re: server terminated by a query in 7.3 |