From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
Date: | 2002-12-12 00:22:43 |
Message-ID: | 200212120022.gBC0MhO11893@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Thomas O'Connell wrote:
> has anyone put together a Sensible Strategies for Upgrading document
> when moving from 7.2.x to 7.3?
>
> for instance, i've read in a few different places that not all
> dependencies will be appropriately created.
>
> as an admin, my biggest questions are:
>
> 1. is it necessary, strongly recommended, recommended, or irrelevant to
> run contrib/adddepend?
Depends if you want that dependency --- I certainly would.
> 2. is it necessary, strongly recommended, recommended, or irrelevant to
> upgrade DBD::Pg for people accessing postgres via the Perl DBI? speaking
> of which, are there docs about what changed in the latest DBD::Pg?
I would. The new version has changes from the past 18 months.
> 3. what is the default environment as far as schemas are concerned for
> databases that have been migrated? is there just a public schema created
> for all objects? is it possible to move existing tables into
> user-created schemas? i didn't see an ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA...
>
> 4. are there other important considerations i might be overlooking?
>
> i've read the new docs, but the upgrade section remains much the same as
> previous versions, despite the fact that there seem to be enough catalog
> changes between 7.2 and 7.3 that admins ought to be paying attention to
> more details than are presented there. so far, the reading i've done has
> provided a varying amount of detail in a variety of places: the new
> version of the docs, the HISTORY file, the mailing lists; but nothing
> i've yet seen gives a complete picture of the important details to be
> considered when upgrading. maybe the details aren't as important as i'm
> guessing? i kind of feel otherwise, though.
Yes, we aren't great about presenting release information in a 100%
complete way. FYI, the system catalog changes relate mostly to
interface/tool authors, so it doesn't appear prominently.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-12 00:31:41 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-12-11 22:25:56 | Re: 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-12 00:31:41 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-12-11 22:25:56 | Re: 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-12 00:31:41 | Re: [GENERAL] 7.2.x -> 7.3 upgrade docs? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2002-12-12 00:11:44 | Potentially serious migration issue from 7.1.3 to 7.2 (or 7.3) |