Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem

Added to TODO.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Greg Copeland wrote:
> Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes.
> This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.
>
>
> --
> Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
> Copeland Computer Consulting
>
>
> On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
> > >
> > > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
> > > desires as an identifiable TODO category. There are a couple of threads
> > > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the
> > > different things we want to do, though. (Improving the error-reporting
> > > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can
> > > recall offhand.)
> >
> > Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I
> > have kept the email messages. Today I updated the TODO list and added a
> > section for them.
>
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073