Re: performance tuning

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance tuning
Date: 2002-12-04 12:15:00
Message-ID: 20021204121500.GE9782@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:48:46PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> >Since postgres
> >seems to think that the nested loop takes so long do I have to lower
> >cpu_operator_cost to get postgres to use the nested loop?
>
> To answer my own question that doesn't work. I've kept playing around with
> different paramaters with different variables but I can't find anything
> except disabling seqscans.
>
> This is really annoying, because *all* of my queries suddenly slowed down
> at the same time. What can I do? Is there something I can change in the
> source to have nested loops seem cheaper? I haven't found anything.

What does explain analyze tell you?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Support bacteria! They're the only culture some people have.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2002-12-04 13:00:05 Re: problem startting postgresql
Previous Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2002-12-04 11:56:10 Re: pg and number of parameters by insert