| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jon Swinth <jswinth(at)atomicpc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two features left |
| Date: | 2002-11-27 19:42:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200211271942.gARJgbA21628@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jon Swinth wrote:
> The other feature is to allow transactions to continue without being forced to
> rollback when a SQL exception occurs. In many applications, a SQL exception
> is handled and an appropriate alternative generated so the transaction goes
> on. PostgreSQL does not support this and errors on every call made in the
> same transaction before calling rollback. Some people are willing and able
> to adjust there application code to handle this. Many people have long
> running transactions where this is not easily accomplished or are using a
> pre-existing application that they can't change.
I am going to try to add nested transactions in 7.4. Will that help
you?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2002-11-27 19:44:02 | Re: Request from eWeek for 7.3 comments |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-27 19:42:10 | Re: fatal error in database |