Re: nested transactions

From: snpe <snpe(at)snpe(dot)co(dot)yu>
To: Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: nested transactions
Date: 2002-11-22 17:47:29
Message-ID: 200211221747.29492.snpe@snpe.co.yu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 22 November 2002 04:36 pm, Scott Lamb wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am going to work on nested transactions for 7.4.
>
> If you're going to do a lot of reworking of how transactions are
> handled, maybe this is a good time to beg for cursors that stay open
> across commits. It looks like the JDBC driver is moving to using cursors
> with ResultSet.CLOSE_CURSORS_AT_COMMIT, for the advantage of not having
> to fetch the entire result immediately and hold it in memory. If this
> were implemented, the same could be done for
> ResultSet.HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT, which I think a lot of JDBC code needs.
>

I agree.It is my favorite features - and if you set savepoint I think that stay first solution
(begin; ... ; begin; ...; begin; ...;comit; ...;commit;...; commit;

Thanks
Haris Peco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-11-22 18:19:40 quote_ident and schemas (was Re: connectby with schema)
Previous Message snpe 2002-11-22 17:30:35 Re: Question about DEADLOCK