From: | snpe <snpe(at)snpe(dot)co(dot)yu> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Lamb <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: nested transactions |
Date: | 2002-11-22 17:47:29 |
Message-ID: | 200211221747.29492.snpe@snpe.co.yu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 22 November 2002 04:36 pm, Scott Lamb wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am going to work on nested transactions for 7.4.
>
> If you're going to do a lot of reworking of how transactions are
> handled, maybe this is a good time to beg for cursors that stay open
> across commits. It looks like the JDBC driver is moving to using cursors
> with ResultSet.CLOSE_CURSORS_AT_COMMIT, for the advantage of not having
> to fetch the entire result immediately and hold it in memory. If this
> were implemented, the same could be done for
> ResultSet.HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT, which I think a lot of JDBC code needs.
>
I agree.It is my favorite features - and if you set savepoint I think that stay first solution
(begin; ... ; begin; ...; begin; ...;comit; ...;commit;...; commit;
Thanks
Haris Peco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-11-22 18:19:40 | quote_ident and schemas (was Re: connectby with schema) |
Previous Message | snpe | 2002-11-22 17:30:35 | Re: Question about DEADLOCK |