From: | "Rajesh Kumar Mallah(dot)" <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on faster HDDs |
Date: | 2002-11-21 16:45:02 |
Message-ID: | 200211212215.02699.mallah@trade-india.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Hi folks,
I have two options:
3*18 GB 10,000 RPM Ultra160 Dual Channel SCSI controller + H/W Raid 5
and
2*36 GB 15,000 RPM Ultra320 Dual Channel SCSI and no RAID
Does anyone opinions *performance wise* the pros and cons of above
two options.
please take in consideration in latter case its higher RPM and better
SCSI interface.
Regds
Mallah.
--
Rajesh Kumar Mallah,
Project Manager (Development)
Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi
phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M)
Visit http://www.trade-india.com ,
India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc Mitchell | 2002-11-21 16:59:40 | Query performanc issue - too many table? |
Previous Message | Al-Karim Bhamani (LCL) | 2002-11-21 16:17:41 | Cluster Database |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henrik Steffen | 2002-11-21 16:52:05 | vacuum full |
Previous Message | typea | 2002-11-21 16:16:14 | Re: Query Analysis |