Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
Date: 2002-11-21 01:04:06
Message-ID: 200211210104.gAL146e27249@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Log message:
> Finish implementation of hashed aggregation. Add enable_hashagg GUC
> parameter to allow it to be forced off for comparison purposes.
> Add ORDER BY clauses to a bunch of regression test queries that will
> otherwise produce randomly-ordered output in the new regime.

Tom, do we really want to add a GUC that is used just for comparison of
performance? I know we have the seqscan on/off, but there are valid
reasons to do that. Do you think there will be cases where it will
faster to have this hash setting off?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-21 01:05:04 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2002-11-21 01:02:34 pgsql-server/doc TODO

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-21 01:05:04 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-11-21 01:01:01 Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...