From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... |
Date: | 2002-11-21 01:04:06 |
Message-ID: | 200211210104.gAL146e27249@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Log message:
> Finish implementation of hashed aggregation. Add enable_hashagg GUC
> parameter to allow it to be forced off for comparison purposes.
> Add ORDER BY clauses to a bunch of regression test queries that will
> otherwise produce randomly-ordered output in the new regime.
Tom, do we really want to add a GUC that is used just for comparison of
performance? I know we have the seqscan on/off, but there are valid
reasons to do that. Do you think there will be cases where it will
faster to have this hash setting off?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 01:05:04 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian - CVS | 2002-11-21 01:02:34 | pgsql-server/doc TODO |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-21 01:05:04 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-11-21 01:01:01 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... |