From: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RC1? |
Date: | 2002-11-20 12:28:49 |
Message-ID: | 20021120122849.B25210@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:22:08PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> He was testing 7.4devel. That's not the right one.
What's the difference? (Do I really want to wait another day while this
ancient box compiles it given that the chances of it working under
7.4devel and not under 7.3rcN are smaller than the chances of it
working under 7.3rcN and not under 7.4devel, no?)
Patrick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-20 14:33:41 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Reinoud van Leeuwen | 2002-11-20 12:03:18 | Why an array in pg_group? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-20 14:33:41 | Re: RC1? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-20 06:15:12 | Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?) |