| From: | Ian Barwick <barwick(at)akademie(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Wheeler <david(at)wheeler(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, dbi-dev(at)perl(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DBD::PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2002-11-18 17:36:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200211181836.02769.barwick@akademie.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Monday 18 November 2002 18:17, David Wheeler wrote:
> PostgreSQL gets better and better. Yay. However, although I might be
> able to use compile-time macros to determine the PostgreSQL version, I
> have to support a minimum version of PostsgreSQL in the driver. I was
> thinking 7.0 -- maybe it's time to leave the 6.x series behind.
>
> Thoughts, DBD::Pg users?
Existing versions of DBD::Pg aren't suddenly going to get broken ;-)
The README for DBD::Pg 1.13 says 6.5 is the minimum required version,
which I believe was the last major release before 7.0. So anyone
using < 6.5 is out of the DBD::Pg upgrade cycle anyway. A README-
note along the lines of "PostgreSQL 6.5.x users: you need DBD::Pg 1.13"
should suffice.
Ian Barwick
barwick(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-18 17:38:51 | Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR |
| Previous Message | Haris Peco | 2002-11-18 17:36:00 | Re: [GENERAL] DECLARE CURSOR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-18 17:39:02 | Re: DBD::PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tim Bunce | 2002-11-18 17:33:56 | Re: DBD::PostgreSQL |