| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | CLUSTER ALL syntax |
| Date: | 2002-11-17 21:33:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200211172133.gAHLX3q15968@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
In looking at the CLUSTER ALL patch I have applied, I am now wondering
why the ALL keyword is used. When we do VACUUM, we don't use ALL.
VACUUM vacuums all tables. Shouldn't' CLUSTER alone do the same thing.
And what about REINDEX? That seems to have a different syntax from the
other two. Seems there should be some consistency.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-17 21:39:02 | Re: pg_stat_database shows userid as OID |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-17 21:24:49 | Re: pg_stat_database shows userid as OID |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-17 21:39:02 | Re: pg_stat_database shows userid as OID |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-17 21:24:49 | Re: pg_stat_database shows userid as OID |