Re: Time to move on...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to move on...
Date: 2002-11-16 14:10:02
Message-ID: 200211161410.gAGEA3o11830@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > On Saturday 16 November 2002 01:07, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > OK sorry - I was under the impression that core == commit bit...
> >
> > committers != core
>
> Is there any reason for this distinction?

I assume you are asking why there is core? It is really just for
getting a quick vote among folks for final release date, and for
discussing things with individuals and companies who require a private
conversation among PostgreSQL representatives.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message My Deja 2002-11-16 16:47:58 Where can I find a list of the new features appearing in Postgresql 7.3?
Previous Message Evgen Potemkin 2002-11-16 10:28:42 Re: Proposal of hierachical queries (a la Oracle)