Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date: 2002-11-15 18:55:11
Message-ID: 200211151055.11245.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance


Henrik,

> > Well, now it gets more complicated. You need to determine:
> > A) The median processing time of each of those requests.
> > B) The amount of Sort_mem actually required for each request.
>
> as I am dealing with postgres for a webserver the median processing
> time of each request has got to be <1 sec. how can i measure
> the amount of sort_mem needed?

Through experimentation, mostly. SInce you are in a high-volume, small-query
environment, I would try *lowering* your sort mem to see if that has an
adverse impact on queries. A good quick test would be to cut your sort_mem
in half, and then run an EXPLAIN on the query from which you expect the
largest result set, and see if the SORT time on the query has been increased.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-11-15 19:01:48 Re: Postgres Support
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-11-15 18:41:39 Re: Basic Trigger Question

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-15 19:27:29 Re: Sort time
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-11-15 18:48:23 Re: Sort time