Re: Prepare enabled pgbench

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: curtis(at)galtair(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepare enabled pgbench
Date: 2002-11-13 02:55:20
Message-ID: 20021113.115520.45175833.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > My concern is PREPARE/EXECUTE may NOT always improve the
> > performance. I guess we have very few data to judge PREPARE/EXECUTE is
> > good or not. Moreover PREPARE/EXECUTE might be improved in the
> > future. If that happens, keeping that switch would help examining the
> > effect, no?
>
> It would. I was just concerned that having both in there would be a
> maintenance headache and would perhaps double the amount of code and
> make it complicated. Let see what the author does and we can decide
> then.

Ok.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-13 03:15:52 Re: psql tab completion
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-13 02:42:22 Re: Prepare enabled pgbench