Re: RC1 on Friday?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1 on Friday?
Date: 2002-11-09 03:56:29
Message-ID: 200211090356.gA93uTj04130@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
> > > > that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
> > >
> > > well, right now, we are waiting for an updated 'supported platforms' list
> > > due to having to put out beta5 :(
> >
> > The changes since our platform reports are _not_ platform-specific, so I
> > don't think we need to run through all platforms again. Even so, it is
> > good to wait until Monday to see if anything pops out.
>
> So, you are saying that the changes that tom made that required an initdb
> of those testing will not impact, in any way, how postgresql operates on
> any of those platforms that have been reported on already?
>
> tom, do you have as much confidence in your changes as bruce? if so, why
> didn't we just go to RC1, instead of a beta?

I can answer that. The feeling was that because we were requiring
initdb during beta, we needed _a_ beta with the new catalog format
before going to RC1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-09 04:32:29 Re: RC1 on Friday?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-11-09 03:46:20 Re: RC1 on Friday?