| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1 on Friday? |
| Date: | 2002-11-09 03:56:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200211090356.gA93uTj04130@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > The urgency is that we should focus on getting to RC1. The issue is
> > > > that we don't have anything to focus on, so why delay?
> > >
> > > well, right now, we are waiting for an updated 'supported platforms' list
> > > due to having to put out beta5 :(
> >
> > The changes since our platform reports are _not_ platform-specific, so I
> > don't think we need to run through all platforms again. Even so, it is
> > good to wait until Monday to see if anything pops out.
>
> So, you are saying that the changes that tom made that required an initdb
> of those testing will not impact, in any way, how postgresql operates on
> any of those platforms that have been reported on already?
>
> tom, do you have as much confidence in your changes as bruce? if so, why
> didn't we just go to RC1, instead of a beta?
I can answer that. The feeling was that because we were requiring
initdb during beta, we needed _a_ beta with the new catalog format
before going to RC1.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-09 04:32:29 | Re: RC1 on Friday? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-11-09 03:46:20 | Re: RC1 on Friday? |