From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <terry(at)ashtonwoodshomes(dot)com>, "Postgresql Sql Group (E-mail)" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FW: query optimization question |
Date: | 2002-11-06 15:11:22 |
Message-ID: | 200211061511.22676.dev@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wednesday 06 Nov 2002 2:01 pm, terry(at)ashtonwoodshomes(dot)com wrote:
> However, for the total deficiencies I am then splitting up the total into
> aging groups, eg <30, 30-60, 60-90, and >90 days old. The query for that
> looks like the below. But before I paste it in, I would like to optimize
> it, if I could do so with a group by clause I most certainly would, but I
> don't see how I can BECAUSE OF THE AGING BREAKDOWN:
[one sub-query per age-range]
> AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-07'}
> ) AS def_count_less_30,
> AND dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-07'}
> AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-07'}
> ) AS def_count_30_60,
Could you not define a function age_range(date) to return the relevant range
text, then group on that text? I've used that before.
--
Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Haller | 2002-11-06 15:58:31 | Re: query optimization question |
Previous Message | Huub | 2002-11-06 14:18:38 | primary keys |