Re: owner of type 'mmm' apperars to be invalid

On Tuesday 05 Nov 2002 2:32 pm, cristi wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 Nov 2002 1:03 pm, cristi wrote:
> >But - you have deleted the "refcursor" type which is not a good idea! If

> Ooo!!!!
> Yes, I see...
> You right.
>
> >If so, drop and recreate the database, restoring the data to it. If not, I
> think you'll
> >need to restore the template1 db - there's an article on
> >techdocs.postgresql.org about this (byJosh IIRC).
>
> Would you give me the URL address for this article?
> Please!

It's "Adventures in PostgreSQL, Episode 1 by Josh Berkus"
at http://techdocs.postgresql.org/
Loads of other good stuff there too.

Might not be necessary though - if the template1 db contains the refcursor
type definition then you just need to drop and recreate the problem database.

--
Richard Huxton