From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: v7.3Beta4 Tag'd and Packaged ... |
Date: | 2002-11-05 17:10:30 |
Message-ID: | 20021105131002.R91541-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >>As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
> >>(BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
> >>that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
>
> It is easy to move both directions; I've done it. You need to have the
> right stuff in your checked-out tree (probably the branch), and you need
> to do the merge from HEAD. What went wrong in trying to do that?
Okay, definitely something that I'd like to document how to do for next
time ... from what I read in the CVS docs (info cvs), you could pull a
branch into HEAD using the -j option ... for instance, I'd checkout HEAD,
and then run:
cvs update -j REL7_3_STABLE
to pull in those changes that were made to the REL7_3_STABLE branch ...
But, if I did:
cvs checkout -rREL7_3_STABLE pgsql
What would I use as BRANCHNAME in the -j to 'pull in' the changes we made
to HEAD? Or is there where I'm misunderstanding something?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-11-05 17:11:29 | Re: rebuilding beta4 ... fails in docs build ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-05 17:09:40 | Re: Request for supported platforms |