Re: v7.3Beta4 Tag'd and Packaged ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v7.3Beta4 Tag'd and Packaged ...
Date: 2002-11-05 17:10:30
Message-ID: 20021105131002.R91541-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> >>As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
> >>(BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
> >>that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
>
> It is easy to move both directions; I've done it. You need to have the
> right stuff in your checked-out tree (probably the branch), and you need
> to do the merge from HEAD. What went wrong in trying to do that?

Okay, definitely something that I'd like to document how to do for next
time ... from what I read in the CVS docs (info cvs), you could pull a
branch into HEAD using the -j option ... for instance, I'd checkout HEAD,
and then run:

cvs update -j REL7_3_STABLE

to pull in those changes that were made to the REL7_3_STABLE branch ...

But, if I did:

cvs checkout -rREL7_3_STABLE pgsql

What would I use as BRANCHNAME in the -j to 'pull in' the changes we made
to HEAD? Or is there where I'm misunderstanding something?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-11-05 17:11:29 Re: rebuilding beta4 ... fails in docs build ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-05 17:09:40 Re: Request for supported platforms