Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug
Date: 2002-11-02 05:42:03
Message-ID: 200211020542.gA25g3T29847@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is this a TODO?
>
> Yes. Maybe
>
> * Acquire lock on a relation before building a relcache entry for it
>
> I'm not quite sure yet how this should interact with the case where
> you already have a relcache entry, but certainly the existing behavior
> of "build the whole entry and then acquire lock" is not good.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-11-02 05:42:19 Re: about postgresql-7.2.3 rpm
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-02 05:41:28 Re: move 0 behaviour