Re: Does this matter?

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does this matter?
Date: 2002-11-01 21:10:57
Message-ID: 20021101161057.V5799@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance pgsql-sql

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:53:29PM -0800, Philip Hallstrom wrote:

> > is padded out to the specified length. Therefore the index on a char(36)
> > column will be a little larger, and thus a little slower, than the char(20).
> >
>
> Really? According to this url (search for "Tip") there is no performance
> difference just a space difference. I don't know for sure either way, but
> if there is a difference the manual needs updating.

Hmm. Maybe a clarification, but I don't think this is quite what the
tip is talking about. The tip points out that part of the cost is
"the increased storage" from the blank-padded type (char) as
contrasted with non-padded types (like text). The tip isn't talking
about whether a length of 20 is faster than a length of 36. Anyway,
I can't really believe the length would be a big deal except on
really huge tables.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-01 22:00:09 Re: Does this matter?
Previous Message Philip Hallstrom 2002-11-01 20:53:29 Re: Does this matter?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2002-11-01 21:27:28 Re: unnecessary updates
Previous Message Philip Hallstrom 2002-11-01 20:53:29 Re: Does this matter?