From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does this matter? |
Date: | 2002-11-01 21:10:57 |
Message-ID: | 20021101161057.V5799@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:53:29PM -0800, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> > is padded out to the specified length. Therefore the index on a char(36)
> > column will be a little larger, and thus a little slower, than the char(20).
> >
>
> Really? According to this url (search for "Tip") there is no performance
> difference just a space difference. I don't know for sure either way, but
> if there is a difference the manual needs updating.
Hmm. Maybe a clarification, but I don't think this is quite what the
tip is talking about. The tip points out that part of the cost is
"the increased storage" from the blank-padded type (char) as
contrasted with non-padded types (like text). The tip isn't talking
about whether a length of 20 is faster than a length of 36. Anyway,
I can't really believe the length would be a big deal except on
really huge tables.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-11-01 22:00:09 | Re: Does this matter? |
Previous Message | Philip Hallstrom | 2002-11-01 20:53:29 | Re: Does this matter? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-11-01 21:27:28 | Re: unnecessary updates |
Previous Message | Philip Hallstrom | 2002-11-01 20:53:29 | Re: Does this matter? |