Re: Low Budget Performance

From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
To: eric soroos <eric-psql(at)soroos(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance
Date: 2002-10-29 07:07:50
Message-ID: 200210290807.50625.mweilguni@sime.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Am Montag, 28. Oktober 2002 22:56 schrieb eric soroos:
> Raid?
> 0 gives better latency if the controller reads from whichever gets the data
> first. It's unclear if IDE or software raid actually does this though. 1
> Gives better throughput, at a cost to latency.
> 5 Like 1 but with redundancy. It's unclear if I'll be able to do this
> without hardware SCSI raid.

Just for the raid part, we've very good expiriences with Raid 10. Performs well and has mirroring. Avoid Raid 5 if possible, write performance will suffer greatly.

Regards,
Mario Weilguni

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-10-29 13:38:24 Re: [pgsql-performance] Performance Problems
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-29 06:30:45 Re: Low Budget Performance