Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Derek Barrett" <derekbarrett(at)graffiti(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
Date: 2002-10-28 23:30:17
Message-ID: 200210281530.17174.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Derek,

> Well, I do agree with Postgres being older and more
> established, but as far as name recognition goes,
> I would put SAP as being ahead in that category
> by a wide margin.

SAP is well-known; SAP DB is not. I try to mention it whenever I list off OS
databases (along with Phoenix) because nobody seems to have heard of it, and
it's a natural for Oracle migrators.

> Their free db also has built in replication.

Yeah. I wish we could use their implementation, but the back-end
architectures are radically different.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Derek Barrett 2002-10-28 23:46:37 Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
Previous Message Derek Barrett 2002-10-28 23:16:22 Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement