Re: beta3 packaged ...

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > > > Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
> > > > should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
> > > > announcing ...
> > >
> > > Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
> > > dialup connection ...
> >
> > 'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
> > server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...
> >
> > Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?
>
> Yes. If we din't need an initdb, we may have just skipped beta3 and
> jumped right to RC1 next Friday.

With the amount of chnages that went in between beta2 and no, there is no
way that an RC1 would go out without a beta3 :)