Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-24 01:37:08
Message-ID: 200210240137.g9O1b8H23922@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Giles Lean wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > OK, well BSD/OS now works, but I wonder if there are any other quad
> > off_t OS's out there without fseeko.
>
> NetBSD prior to 1.6, released September 14, 2002. (Source: CVS logs.)

OK, does pre-1.6 NetBSD have fgetpos/fsetpos that is off_t/quad?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2002-10-24 01:37:20 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 01:36:35 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?