From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Default cost variables in postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2002-10-21 14:16:21 |
Message-ID: | 20021021101621.A19970@mail.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 12:04:58AM -0700, Ludwig Lim wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Are the "cost" variables (e.g.
> random_page_cost,cpu_tuple_cost,cpu_index_tuple_cost)
> in postgresql.conf optimal for a particular set of
> platform / hardware requirements? (i.e. the configs
Not exactly. They're best guesses. If you check the admin guide,
you'll see that there's a note about these which says that there is
not a well-defined method for calculating these things, so you are
encouraged to experiment and share your findings. They _are_ known
to be conservative defaults, like everything else in the system.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ludwig Lim | 2002-10-22 11:47:38 | Selective usage of index in planner/optimizer (Too conservative?) |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-10-21 13:00:25 | Re: Self-generating statistics? |