Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-21 01:50:30
Message-ID: 200210210150.g9L1oUX09969@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner wrote:
> At 09:18 PM 20/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> I'm happy to apply it when necessary; but I wouldn't do it until we've from
> some someone with a big-endian machine...

Well, I think Tom was going to try it on his HPUX machine. However, it
is on the open items list, so we are going to need to get it in there
soon anyway, or yank it all out. If no big endian people want to test
it, we will have to ship and then I am sure some big-ending testing will
happen. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-21 02:01:04 Re: timestamp cast to abstime problem
Previous Message Philip Warner 2002-10-21 01:47:40 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?