Re: ECPG and bison

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG and bison
Date: 2002-10-19 03:03:30
Message-ID: 20021019000251.D16551-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >> Looks like threre is a 1.75 out (based on a FreeBSD PR I just saw fly
> >> by).
>
> > I can confirm that:
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bison/
> > Attached is the Changelog since 1.50.
>
> Urgh. Nothing like major releases 2 weeks apart to give one a nice warm
> comfy feeling about the stability of one's tools.
>
> Offhand it looks like these are nearly all bug fixes, and so we'd better
> standardize on 1.75 not 1.50. But I wonder what will be out next
> week...

that's one of hte reasons I've been holding off (the other being a busy
week) ... I *try* to keep stuff like this to what the FreeBSD ports
collection considers a stable release, and it hasn't been updated yet :(

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2002-10-19 03:06:40 Re: ECPG and bison
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-10-19 03:01:49 Re: ECPG and bison