Re: ECPG and bison

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG and bison
Date: 2002-10-18 22:08:25
Message-ID: 200210182208.g9IM8P221214@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Michael Meskes writes:
>
> > Could anyone please tell me if we found a solution? It seems I missed
> > any discussion or whatsoever. The only things I know is that
> > postgresql.org still has bison 1.35 installed and 7.3 release is
> > nearing.
>
> I suggest that you merge your branch as soon as you are ready and force
> the issue a bit. It's not like the bison installation on
> postgresql.org can make the world stop.

Agreed. We need to push this.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-10-18 22:09:49 Re: ECPG and bison
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-10-18 22:07:07 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?